Why the Willow Project is instrumental to the US
A Conocophillips owned exploratory drilling camp at the proposed site of the Willow Project. Photo courtesy of ConocoPhillips
April 7, 2023
On Tuesday, March 13th. US President Joe Biden approved a highly controversial Willow Project. The Project and its approval have created a lot of controversy due to opposition from those advocating against it due to environmental concerns. The project was proposed by ConocoPhillips, a Houston-based Alaskan oil company that owned roughly 1.6 Million acres of land at the end of 2021. The project itself is planned to be built on the Northern Slope of Alaska with five proposed major drilling sites, so far three have been approved. They plan on targeting a petroleum reserve that was set aside for drilling about a century ago.
The first Alaskan native in Congress and an advocate for the project, Democratic Rep. Mary Peltola expressed how important to the Alaskan people and natives this project is. Native Groups in Alaska have also given support with the understanding that it would open up many job opportunities in a failing market that is still recovering from a spike in unemployment from the COVID-19 pandemic. The estimated job openings would be 2,500 jobs during the construction process and 300 permanent jobs after the construction process is completed. Not only will the Willow Project produce jobs but it will also help stabilize the US’s troubled economy. The project’s proposed daily output is estimated to be around 180,000 barrels a day. According to Macrotrends, at year open, the price per barrel of Oil was $80.26 with 2022s average being $94.53 with hopes that in the project’s estimated 30-year lifespan it can lower these numbers while also lowering the prices of gas and plastics.
![](https://theforestscout.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Screen-Shot-2023-04-07-at-11.50.30-AM-475x305.png)
A Change.org petition aimed towards the White House opposing the project has reached 3.7 million signatures out of the 4.5 million goal. These signatures come from those who oppose the project in the name of protecting the environment. Many of these people are also now turning towards President Biden’s Administration which seems to come into direct contridiciton with the administration’s goal of reducing the number of approved drilling sites in the US.
Cole Clayton • Apr 10, 2023 at 3:55 pm
The Alaskans are out in force on this one. An excellent first column, Colin.
Dolly Norton • Apr 8, 2023 at 3:25 pm
Bulloney,
The jobs will go to out of state workers not we landowner.
Let’s talk about Office of Public Advocacy, they (OPA) have put in hundreds of court orders without burden of proof, to steal over 100 natives disability, corporation,
and PFD’s who are not are not incncapacitated. So wrong.
Gregory Corbett • Apr 8, 2023 at 10:47 am
Prejudice Headline!! Everything in the article is positive! We do need to reduce our oil dependence. However we are decades away from this happening, in the meantime use our oil resources to help lower energy costs while developing sustainable energy.
I guarantee not one of those protesters has ever been on the Alaskan tundra. Come See and understand what is involved before you make a judgment off of someone else’s idea or opinion.
John • Apr 8, 2023 at 12:56 am
Drill baby drill! Unless you live in Alaska keep y’all opinions to yourself self. We need to stay warm.