Districts await legal decision that could overturn mask requirement
January 21, 2022
In early January, a Sangamon County judge heard arguments from the DeVore Lawsuit seeking to overturn mask requirements in schools across Illinois. A ruling is anticipated to be released next week at the earliest.
The lawsuit, initially filed by Attorney Thomas DeVore in October on behalf of parents from 145 school districts across the state including District 115 and District 67, challenges Governor JB Pritzker’s executive orders requiring masks in schools, vaccine or testing for school employees, and the exclusion of students from in-person learning if they have been identified as close contacts.
The decision of the case would extend to all students in a school district, not just those of the named plaintiffs.
If the judge rules in favor of the plaintiff, all 145 districts involved in the suit, including District 67 and 115 will be, for the time being, unable to enforce the use of masks or exclude close contacts from in person learning.
If the judge denies the motion of a temporary restraining order on the mandate, masks will continue to be required and enforced.
On Wednesday, Superintendent Matthew Mongomery issued a letter to District 67 and District 115 parents and guardians regarding the anticipated legal decision “in the spirit of transparency and ‘no surprises.’”
“If the Court issues a temporary restraining order on the mask mandate as well as close contact exclusions, the District will cooperate while continuing to encourage mask wearing and the implementation of all of our other mitigation strategies which, to date, have proven largely effective,” the letter states.
Principal Erin Lenart also reached out to LFHS staff via email.
“We will be campaigning to both promote mask wearing during the surge and strongly encourage quarantines and isolation when appropriate,” she said.
Among the measures that will be taken should the temporary restraining order take place will be plexiglass partitions available for all teacher desks in classrooms and KN95 masks available for all students and staff.
LFHS students are anticipating the release of the court decision.
Some question the argument for not requiring masks.
“If masks are keeping me and my classmates safe, then why would we get rid of them in the first place?” senior Ally Galiene asked.
Galiene also advocates for further measures to be taken to mitigate risks if masks are no longer required.
“If masks aren’t required, then we should definitely have mandatory weekly testing,” she said.
Junior Mariella Haubner expresses concern for both herself and her teachers, and plans to continue to wear one at school despite the judge’s ruling.
“I don’t want to get sick, and I believe they help,” Haubner said. “I know a lot of teachers would not feel comfortable coming to school when this surge is going on if we are no longer protected. I feel the same way. No one wants to get COVID, so why are we starting to stop caring?”
Others, however, are in favor of removing the mask requirement.
“If you are a perfectly healthy person who shows no symptoms of any sickness, the mask should simply be your choice. Taking the choice away from the people would be in direct conflict with what makes our nation so great,” senior Patrick Lindemann said. “I believe if the judge were to rule in favor of disbanding the mandate, there would be collective cheers from most of the students and many members of the faculty.”
As the community awaits the ruling, Dr. Montgomery vows that the school will continue to be transparent.
“We will keep you updated as we learn more and remain committed to the health, safety, and well-being of our District students, staff, and families,” he said.
Logic is Key • Jan 28, 2022 at 11:56 pm
Countries in Europe are elevating Covid from a pandemic to an endemic, so why aren’t we doing the same? Spain has already relaxed both mask and vaccine requirements. The only reason we are still wearing masks is pointless political theater. The CDC is not providing accurate recommendations as evident by them cutting the quarantine period in HALF for no apparent reason. They even discouraged wearing masks at the beginning of the April 2020, albeit because they were needed for healthcare. The point is that the recommendations of the CDC are rarely based on hard data, and the masks are another part of this. There has been no hard data that masks provide any substantial benefit to stop the spread of respiratory disease. In fact, there is data that masks have provided NEGATIVE side effects. We just need to start getting these masks out of our society, barring the immunocompromised. If there is anything I missed please let me know.
Scouts supporting science • Jan 23, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Will our school districts sue the plaintiffs from our district (Andrea Baldi, Joanna and Patrick Marshall) for any legal fees incurred if the motion is denied? I think the tax payers of this community should not be financially on the hook for their ignorance.
Anonymous • Jan 29, 2022 at 9:46 pm
Who’s paying for all the increased mental health suffering and consequences that have taken place because of our “very effective” lockdowns. Not to mention the degradation in adolescent iq.
Science follower • Jan 21, 2022 at 5:05 pm
My body my choice
Mary an Beardman • Jan 26, 2022 at 12:29 pm
It is not always just about you. It is also to protect other people. I wish we could think beyond just ourselves. I am a long hauler now. It has been beyond scary. I always wore a mask and was vaccinated. But someone I was with did not!
LFHS Scout Fan • Jan 21, 2022 at 4:11 pm
Should the ruling strike down the executive orders, it is my hope that those who “collectively cheer” understand that with that freedom comes responsibility. I would hope we can move forward regardless of the ruling carrying a modicum of decency. Freedom of choice doesn’t mean a hall pass to be a jerk living care free without consideration of what others might be dealing with. Fighting about this isn’t worth splintering friendships.
Educate yourself • Jan 21, 2022 at 11:43 am
Anyone who thinks that there would be “collective cheers” from many members of the faculty obviously hasn’t spent much time speaking with their teachers. You’re selfish. Check yourself.
A perfectly healthy person who shows no symptoms of any sickness • Jan 21, 2022 at 10:27 am
People who claim that the mask mandate is “in direct conflict with what makes our nation so great” have clearly never paid attention in history class, nor have they actually read the founding documents of our country. Embarrassing, honestly. This debate, which never should’ve existed in the first place, has descended into pure idiocy and it’s making us all look like fools to the rest of the world.
Mask Free February • Jan 21, 2022 at 3:59 pm
Pretty embarrassing to take the time to comment that Patrick Lindemann hasn’t read the founding documents of our country; I bet you’re really proud that you have, though.