Love It or Leave It
An Open Letter to Those Who Doubt Science
May 12, 2020
For two hundred thousand years we were helpless. We huddled in caves, completely powerless on the great battlefield of earth, wind, air, and fire. We gnawed on roots, nuts, berries, and any other forage we could find. Every once in a while we spent half a day running down a gazelle. Some of us dwelled on the coast; we ate clams and fish and made necklaces of seashells.
It was a simple life, but rewarding, for nothing on this earth compares to the experience of sitting around a fire with your friends and family after a long day of hard work. If you didn’t die horribly in infancy, on the hunt, in childbirth, in a feud with a neighboring tribe, in a famine, or in a plethora of other ways.
Our modern life has its ups and downs, but it is infinitely better than those dark and dismal days of our past. We can gaze down on this blue marble from above. We can communicate with people on the other side of the planet. We have literature, art, and music of such number and variety that no one can experience it all. Most of the world’s population lives in peace and health, with a more or less decent standard of living. The twenty-first century is the best time to be a human being in human history.
It is exclusively because of the rational pursuit of curiosity that we have come this far. Fire, the wheel, agriculture, iron, steam power, air conditioning, medicine, smartphones — all of it comes from eons of careful refinement, improving what works and discarding what doesn’t. Of late we have taken to calling it the scientific method, but even the most cursory glance at human history reveals an unbroken stream of discovery guided by logical principles.
If you are not a hunter-gatherer living in the bush, or an indigenous villager deep in the heart of the rainforest, you are guilty as charged of participating in the scientific odyssey that has allowed us to transform from a scared bunch of cavemen to a technological civilization that numbers seven billion and extends from pole to pole and meridian to meridian.
That scientific odyssey should have prepared us for the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Other countries — New Zealand, for instance — have used a combination of empathy and medically-informed decision making to weather the storm of COVID-19 much better than the United States has, as measured in both total cases and cases per capita.
In contrast, the President’s daily news briefings are disgustingly partisan affairs where he declares “I don’t take responsibility at all” and spews general nonsense. Southern governors rush to reopen their states despite the dangers of doing so. We are a superpower because of our technologically advanced economy and military, but thanks to the quacks in government and media we are abandoning science when we need it most.
The facts are these: there is no proven remedy for the coronavirus, the Food and Drug Administration has cautioned against the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine due to the risk of heart issues, and people have died after using chloroquine on the “advice” of the President. Medical experts and economists alike agree that reopening the economy too soon would be an unmitigated disaster. Pedantic chuntering about the jury still being out is crass, infantile, and grossly irresponsible.
You can dispute the facts, but that does not make you a bold dissenter with the right to dub yourself the “voice crying out in the wilderness.” You can refuse to change your mind in the face of overwhelming evidence, but that does not entitle you to say “nevertheless, I persisted.”
It makes you a close-minded idiot and a dirty hypocrite.
This is a free country, as some are so fond of saying. You can love it, or you can leave it.
You can love twenty-first century science and stand in solidarity with the experts in opposing the misguided efforts to reopen the economy too soon — or you can leave it, and go back to the slimy mudholes whence all of us once crawled.
Unfortunately, time travel is currently thought to be impossible. Unfortunately, it is exceptionally difficult to transition from the rather sedentary American lifestyle to a mode of living built on endurance. Unfortunately, most of the world’s land area is either already inhabited, on fire, irreparably damaged by climate change, or some combination of the three — not very welcoming to new settlers.
In the meantime, then, you would do well to cease your primitive mud-spewing and let the adults in the room solve the problem.
the cool guy 1 • Nov 20, 2020 at 10:39 am
While science has been a very powerful tool for progressing human society, it also has a lot of downsides. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in“advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society,have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human being to greater in-dignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world,it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine.Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
Keyser Söze • May 18, 2020 at 11:26 am
@PersonwhokindaagreeswithName?? You certainly have a point, but the problem is this article is one of those that turns to that guy named “science” as an answer. It’s not that they truly believe that “science” is going to provide all the answers, but rather that they just want to create a narrative – that doesn’t actually mean anything – to do whatever they can to cast Trump and the Republican party as primitive beings living in the stone age. This of course happens because, you know, Trump is the most evil man in the history of the world and this virus is 100% his fault. In science there is never true general consensus and this anti-Trump narrative states that we have to wait until it’s “safe” – or rather until the polls open up in the fall. We can’t sit here and wait for a remedy or vaccine to magically appear, this stuff takes time. The common cold is a coronavirus. Is there a vaccine for that? Waiting for answers from “science” is simply an attempt to discredit Trump and Republicans. It doesn’t mean anything because scientists never completely agree. Instead of trapping everyone at home why don’t we let people have a choice to re-open their businesses and get back to work and continue to quarantine those who are at risk? Millions of people are unnecessarily suffering because of this ridiculous narrative.
Person who kinda agrees with Name?? • May 18, 2020 at 1:09 am
I agree with @Name??’s general point here — we should be empathizing with people who are hurting, but I don’t think that means opening the economy RIGHT FREAKING NOW GRR, I think it means making sure everyone has everything they need to get through this. This article seems to be arguing that it’s stupid to doubt the science against reopening too soon, but it says nothing about the people who are hurting; I don’t think that’s the point of the article.
@Contrarian Polemicist and its cousin amuse me because they’re criticizing this author for being so harsh but that’s exactly what a polemic is supposed to be. You two should look yourselves in the mirror.
Name?? • May 15, 2020 at 10:58 am
I’m confused, are you meaning to call everyone who wants to reopen the economy, people who very well could be, and oftentimes are, struggling to feed their kids with no source of income, “a close minded idiot”? You can’t give struggling Americans a small stimulus payment and just expect them to sit happily in their homes while having little way of obtaining food, I feel as though you should at least empathize with their situation.
Contrarian Polemecist's Cousin • May 13, 2020 at 2:22 pm
Science is a liar sometimes. Aristotle was once thought to be the smartest man on the planet. He believed that the Earth was the center of the universe, and everybody believed him because he was so smart. Until another smartest guy came around, Galileo, and he disproved that theory, making Aristotle and everybody else on Earth look like a chump. Of course, Galileo then thought comets were an optical illusion, and there was no way that the moon could cause the ocean’s tides. Everybody believed that because he was so smart. He was also wrong, making him and everyone else on Earth look like a chump again. And then, best of all… Sir Isaac Newton gets born and blows everybody’s mind with his big brains. ‘Course, he also thought he could turn metal into gold, and died eating mercury, making him yet another stupid chump!
Contrarian Polemicist • May 13, 2020 at 6:23 am
And this is the message to dissidents: “It makes you a close-minded idiot and a dirty hypocrite.” So anyone that has a different opinion or who is not buying into the mass hysteria is a close-minded idiot and a dirty hypocrite? Well, that is a harsh way to go about political discourse. Instead of making an actual argument and saying here is the data as to why we should not re-open, you just point to so called “experts” and shut up the opposition. Have you ever thought for once in your life that maybe, just maybe, the experts are wrong? Have you actually done your own research on the coronavirus, and have you found that these Southern governors are not so dumb after all? You do not explain how re-opening the economy would be an unmitigated disaster, so no one can specifically refute you there. The goal of the lockdowns was to stop the hospitals from getting overrun. Now the elite have suddenly shifted the goal to eradication of the coronavirus. It is impossible to eradicate. It is super contagious. Everyone will get it. The hospitals are not overrun at all right now, the goal of the lockdown worked, and hence it is no longer necessary. Imagine just listening to experts blindly without doing your own research! You make all these claims and simply don’t back them up. Why? Because you cannot back them up with any data that doesn’t come from your “medical experts” who play favorably to your political agenda. By the way, don’t look down on people with an elitist tone by telling them what they can and cannot do. And what they can and cannot use. I will gladly use technology while also complaining about some of its (VERY) negative side effects, thank you very much.